Right now I am sitting and waiting in an airport. Yes, like everyone else who travels from time to time—I hate waiting in airports. Well, I have a couple hours to kill and I might as well do something constructive. Come to think of it, when we look back over our life, where we are now is simply the result or the sum total of what we did with our free time. Yes, that is very, very, very true. If life does not teach us anything else, it teaches us that in the end, the time we wasted, invested, or even watch go by will tell on us in the end. It tells on us physically, psychologically, mentally, and emotionally. What we did with our free time—just free time. I won’t even get into what we did with our time in general. Ha, ha, ha, it is funny and yet tragic to sit here and think about it. Before I decide what to write today (because I am sort of torn at this time), I have to warn you that today I am just going to let my thoughts flow for a while. Today my writing is probably more for me than anyone else. So, sometimes when I may sound a bit preachy or like I am lecturing you all, in all actuality I feed off of these words and advice as much as anyone else. Back to time, time… time… wow, as I write this I think of all the time I have wasted. I am in my mid-thirties now and my age means more to me than it ever has. I mean, I am not getting old or anything like that. But at this stage in a man’s life, some things have to die. Then there are other things that he was always told to think about, but his youth and the recklessness that goes along with it, causes him to continuously put it off. Now, now is the time to take those things off the mental backburner and examine them. Then you start telling yourself, “Wow, how did I not think about this for so long? How stupid could I be?” Then you get into “catch-up mode.” Oh yes, some of you all know exactly what I am talking about. It happens in your thirties. You generally piss away your twenties between good times and procrastination. Then when you start getting a gray hair or two, see someone you grew up with miles ahead of you, or have a sobering/life-changing experience and your eyes start to open and you say, “I gotta get myself together. I can’t believe I have wasted so much time.” This is how “catch-up mode” begins. Catch-up mode causes people to consider going back to school to finish what took them twice as long to get halfway through what they should completed twice in half the time (ha ha ha—get it). Catch up mode is triggered when all your homeys or home-girls are married--and on their second kid and you are still excited by and dipping in and out of one-night-stands and hit-and-run episodes. You think of all the good men and women you passed up or could not commit to and you keep kicking yourself. Catch-up mode makes you look at that dead end job you work, just because you are too lazy to get a job that will pay you more but requires more effort and expects you to be on time. Catch up mode also makes you realize that the only reason you work there is because your “friend with benefits” works there too—how sad. Catch-up mode in general makes you reevaluate your life, your direction, your priorities, your present social life, your destructive and addictive habits, your time-wasters, your friends who are going nowhere fast like you and even your friends who are leaving you behind. Sadly, when catch-up mode calls… some don’t answer. They take a longer toke of the joint, an extra shot of the Tequila, or snort a longer line of the coke to drown out the call—umm I mean the noise. Catch-up mode is intended to get you back on track. It’s intended to awaken you out of life’s hangover that you are perpetually in. But, like your buddy who never knows when he had enough, then of course doesn’t know when he’s had way too much—the longer you ignore the call of catch-up mode, the worse it is when life finally catches up with you. On the other hand, instead of a kick in the pants producing motivation, for some people catch up mode becomes the beginning of their depression and a tool that tears down their fragile self-image. These are the people that hate to look into life’s mirror. Instead of the mirror shattering from what looks into it, the image it reflects shatters the person looking into it. Let me tell you something—I don’t care what you see in the mirror—don’t run from it. Don’t turn your back from it or turn the lights out. If you want to turn something—use what you see to turn your life around. Use it for motivation not discouragement! It sounds so cheesy—but it does not stand any less true; today IS the first day of the rest of your life. If you have breath then you have another chance to make another idiotic decision based in laziness, procrastination, envy, fear, anger, etc. or you can start making better decisions based on reality, truth, positivity, love, forgiveness, and life! Take charge. Don’t tell me about your debt, financial situation, health, rough childhood, last relationship, speech impediment, personal phobias, etc. Put the bottle down, put the weed up, put away the dope for a minute and tell him/her its fun but you gotta chill out for a while. Use what you have and forget about what you don’t have! And there’s one thing that we all have (though not in the same amount)—time. I leave you with a classic verse, “So teach us to number our days, that we may apply our hearts unto wisdom.” (Psalm 90:12).
This Blog is a culmination of the reflections and analyses of my thoughts and travels. Here you will find politics, religion, sports, culture, history, even pop-culture, and anything between. Please enjoy!
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Hatin' On Obama - PART II
- Two White Americas
Anyone who lives in America and does not agree that even in the 21st century that there are many “Americas” must live in a cave somewhere in the Ozark Mountains. America is one nation of course. But because of its huge population (300+ million) and its unprecedented mixture of virtually all nationalities and most ethnicities, many people say (accurately) that there are many Americas. For example there is middle class America, impoverished America, rich America, and super wealthy America. My country has also been classified by generations: baby-boomers, baby-busters, generation “X”, etc. Then there are the Americas classified by race/ethnicity: White America, Black America, Hispanic America, etc. I generally believe that, with regards to the topic of present analyses, there are mainly two White Americas: those that wish to keep certain racial viewpoints and practices the norm and those who wish for an America where race is not the significant factor or pretext to judgment that it once was—in other words, a colorblind America. The honorable Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. once stated that he looked for or “dreamed” for the day that people would not be judged by their racial exterior by the content of their character. This is the America that the latter mentioned Whites—the ones who put the current president in office—that I am talking about. No, before any of you unsheathe your accusatory fingers, let me state this. I AM NOT saying that all White people who did not vote for President Barack Obama, did so because of race--not at all! Many simply voted out of a loyalty to their political attitudes and party. Nonetheless, just as there were many Black voters who (wrongly) voted for him just because he is Black, there were also many White voters who voted for McCain because Mr. Obama is not White. I believe that during these elections there was more of a spirit of voting “against” rather than voting “for.” I also believe that a large number of the White voters who put the current president in office looked at him and instead of asking why, just said, “Why not?” To them, yes, it was truly special to be alive and take part in an election that placed the first Non-White male in the White House. Yet, at the same time, they did not allow the color of his skin to be a determining factor concerning their particular votes. They realized that America must get past race in many regards and the fact that he is Black was purely coincidental. I am sure that Mr. Obama came across as a person that they could place faith in. They were tired of the Bush/Clinton/Bush (possibly Clinton again) democratic monarchy and wanted a fresh, young, articulate face to represent them. The season was ripe for change. And this young, handsome, Black guy with the Arabic name was just the ticket to “change.” I believe the interest in him would have been the same had his ethnicity bestowed upon him the name of Barack Lee Kim, Barack Eduardo Sanchez, Barack Sanjay Patell, or even Barack Boris Kalashnikov. This particular element of White America shed their parent’s racial hang-ups—not racist hang-ups—but racial hang-ups. There is a difference.
There is a stark difference between “racial” and “racist.” Their parents grew up in not only a racist America, but a racial America. This is an America that seemed to be consumed and mesmerized by anything that could be made into something racial. I feel that in order for things to move away from being racist, they have to evolve through a period of being racial. When things stop being racial, then we will have finally arrived into a truly colorblind society. Their parents had to deal with the racial (not racist) dynamics of society like Blacks who broke the color barrier in certain industries, the first Black to accomplish this or that, Black Universities, Black Entertainment Television, Black Hair Care products (which are now comically termed “ethnic”), Black music, Black gospel, Black churches, Ebonics, etc. We are just now breaking away from such terms. But again, their parents, and the other part of White America still see such things as the norm and wish to keep it that way. I am not calling these people racist or even prejudice necessarily—but they are far from colorblind and may never achieve that status. These are the White people who don’t feel comfortable in a room full of Black people, who clutch their purses or walk on the other side of the street when they see a group of Blacks. They are the ones who feel the need to mention to you that a particular person is/was Black when telling you a story regardless of its relevance. They see no problem with the most segregated hour in America (Sunday morning). These are the White pastors who have separate “ministries” and buildings for Black parishioners on the “other side of town”—no, I am not making this up. These are the Whites (and Blacks also) that still have a problem with interracial relationships and marriage. Again, they are not necessarily racist, just racial. These are the Whites who have no problem going to a church where the congregation is racially diverse—as long as the pastor is White. These are even the people who have no issue with befriending and socializing with Blacks—but cannot deal with working for or otherwise having to answer to a Black authority figure. In other words, they have no problem with Black people as long as they are no more than equal to them and/or they stay in their places—geographically and socially. OK, before you say it—I know, I know, there are plenty of Black people stuck in this mental rut too. But I will get to them in another article—be patient.
So, this existence of two White Americas has brought one group’s racial attitudes to the forefront. They just cannot deal with or feel completely comfortable with a Black man as President of the U.S. Because they still see the world and especially “their” country through racial lenses. A Black man standing in front of the infamous lectern emblazoned with the U.S. presidential seal is a symbol to them that their way of thinking and seeing the world is quickly coming to an end. It challenges their racial notions and actually makes whatever scraps of racism within in them surface. They do not want to believe for one minute that they may still be hanging on to some racist attitudes. Nonetheless, dealing with their innate uneasiness and unexplainable frustration stemming from having a Black president forces them to either admit the existence of some vestiges of racial prejudice within or deny it by saying their dislike for the president is because of political differences. Their dishonesty gives rise to many excuses why this current president is so bad. They can often be downright obsessed with removing him. There have actually been a number of these types of White people who seriously suggest that President Obama should be impeached. Seriously? Why? I have no idea, other than they can only regain some sort of comfort in the fact that if he was in removed, they would no longer have to look in the mirror and be shown the ugliness of the racist residue still residing within their characters. So, they spend so much time nitpicking and faultfinding the president. This serves two purposes; it allows them to try and cover the real reason why they can’t stand him and it helps them to deceive their own selves into thinking that their dislike is based solely in political reasons. Part of this manifestation is seen in the enormous amount of negative books that have been written about Barack Obama so far.
- The books
I must admit, what initially inspired me to write this particular piece was something I found in a bookstore when on a short visit to the U.S. I was wandering through the section devoted to politics and came across a ton of books all with the intention to discredit the president. Now, presidents are going to have to deal with authors who write scathing unauthorized biographies, people who write books that are highly critical of their policies and decision making, and even books that are filled with vitriolic and malicious personal attacks. It comes with the job. I can remember the same thing happening to President Bill Clinton, especially around the time he was involved with the whole Monica Lewinsky controversy. Also, how many books have been written about President Bush’s wartime and economic decisions—not to mention the books devoted to printing grammatically incorrect quotes of his or other attempts to paint him as an idiot? It’s normal. But what caught my attention was the sheer amount of Anti-Obama titles on the shelf. He was only president for about two years at the time and I saw more books written against him than I ever saw of the aforementioned presidents. I had to ask why. Then upon further inspection, I found that the books ranged in subject matter to the point where they were contradictory. In other words you had some that presented him as a pro-government, anti-business socialist while others suggested that he was Wall Street’s best friend and only talked tough on cracking down on the lack of ethical practices in the private sector but was really beholden to them. Both cannot be true. Yet, these titles and more were all lined up ready for someone to buy them and buy into the Anti-Obama ideas within. Why were there so many books written like this. What was it about him that amassed this galvanization of dislike and hatred to the point where all these people felt the need to publish it? When you look at the differences between Obama and the other presidents, there is only one glaring difference between them other than his name—his race. But what author in his right mind is going to write an Anti-Obama book centered on the fact that he can’t stand him because he’s Black? So, they have to settle for the next best thing; exaggerate and even fabricate things about him to stir up dissent and thus cover the real source of the ill will. I think I will let the book titles and a small synopsis of each do the talking and I’ll let you draw your own conclusions. I went back home and got on my computer and went to amazon.com to see if their website reflected the amount of Anti-Obama books in comparison to books written against past presidents… same results. Here are just a few of them:
- The Roots Of Obama’s Rage
· The Case Against Barack Obama: The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media's Favorite Candidate
Do I really need to tell you what is printed on these pages? Thought not… next:- Crimes Against Liberty: An Indictment of President Barack Obama
According to the synopsis of this book the author proves that, “As Americans, liberty is an inalienable right that is granted to us by God, protected by the Constitution, and upheld by our government. Yet, Barack Obama doesn’t seem to share that view. To him, liberty is a threat to the government’s power and something to be squashed by any means possible… Limbaugh issues a damning indictment of President Barack Obama for encroaching upon and stripping us of our individual and sovereign rights… Obama is guilty of crimes against liberty.” It gets even more ridiculous. Read on…
- The Manchurian President: Barack Obama's Ties to Communists, Socialists and Other Anti-American Extremists
This book plays off the title of the movie, The Manchurian Candidate, which suggests that the presidency of the U.S. is secretly orchestrated by unknown powers. True or not, this book wants you to believe that President Obama was carefully put in the White House to carry out a special Anti- American agenda created by a secret elite society… ooohhhhh. Honestly, wouldn’t this have made a better sci-fi film than political book?
- The Mendacity of Hope: Barack Obama and the Betrayal of American Liberalism
Unlike most titles that seek to display the president as a staunch left-wing liberal bent on taking America down the road to Socialism, this author proposes the idea that Barack Obama is NOT liberal enough. He states that the people of America voted for a more socialistic type of government and got a president who is pretty much like the one before him. He accuses the president of betraying those on the left with his center to right policies and points of view.
- Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder?
This book by far has got to be one of the most outlandish things ever put into print. The author, Larry Sinclair, alleges, “… that on November 6 & 7, 1999 Sinclair claims that he engaged in homosexual acts with then-Illinois Senator Barack Obama, who during these trysts not only procured cocaine for the author, but also smoked crack cocaine while being fellated. Although relatively unknown outside his home state at the time, Obama hit the national stage in 2004 by delivering a keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention. Sinclair realized only then that he'd engaged in sex with an up-and-coming political superstar. Even more incriminating, Sinclair writes about his concerns that Obama and Reverend Jeremiah Wright were involved in the murder of Obama's former lover, choirmaster Donald Young.” Yes, you just read that. This sounds so crazy that one must wonder who can actually make these things up. I could not write a synopsis on this. I have to cut and paste the quote. I’m sure you can see why.
- Radical-in-Chief: Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism
Yes, another book intended to scare America into thinking that our president is some closet Communist intended on making America into Soviet era Russian (yawn).
- Bought and Paid For: The Unholy Alliance Between Barack Obama and Wall Street
This particular book is a comical departure from the normal attempt at presenting the president as some anti-industry/business Capitalist. Instead it claims that the president “… has climbed into bed with Wall Street CEOs, giving them what they want so they will support his liberal, big-government agenda. As a result, the big banks responsible for the credit crisis get rescued, while small businesses and ordinary Americans get crushed by higher taxes and irresponsible spending.” I wish these guys would make up their mind about him.
- How Barack Obama is Endangering our National Sovereignty
Do I really need to explain the author’s intention in this book?
- How Barack Obama is Bankrupting the U.S. Economy
Yes, years of overspending, the cost of two wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, huge tax cuts for rich people, plus the billions of dollars spent each year on foreign aid have nothing to do with the downfall of the American economy. It’s all Barack Obama’s fault. These guys stoop to levels that are amazing. He is not bankrupting America. He inherited a bankrupt America.
- Barack Obama's Plan to Socialize America and Destroy Capitalism
Yes, wouldn’t you guess; another book about how Barack Obama plans on destroying American Capitalism (as if he could).
- Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks, and Cronies
The title of this book sounds more like it’s about a Middle Eastern or African president.
- Gangster Government: Barack Obama and the New Washington Thugocracy
- The Audacity of Deceit: Barack Obama's War on American Values
- The Obama Nation
What a bunch of morons. But you have to like the word play here; Abomination… Obama Nation. Wow!
- The Blueprint: Obama's Plan to Subvert the Constitution and Build an Imperial Presidency
Really? Do I have to give you an idea of what kind of worthless, pointless, rhetoric is upon the pages of this book?
- Obama Zombies: How the Liberal Machine Brainwashed My Generation
As if zombie films weren’t enough? Now we have books like this?
Look, I understand that is was hard to get through that section. But I had to show you how incessant the dislike and hatred for President Obama truly is. These are just a few of the books devoted to pouring negativity onto him. Just think, we are only halfway through his first term. No other president in the history of the U.S. (maybe Nixon, but I doubt it) has garnered this much resentment. Yet, on the other hand, I don’t believe any other president has achieved Rock Star status like this guy either. It seems like when it comes to this man, you either love him or hate him. I see very few people like myself who are basically neutral towards him. The basic item of discussion in this article is the concept of racism and how it relates to some White American’s feelings towards the president. I believe that most White Americans don’t really care about his color. After all, it was most White Americans that put him in office. The Black vote was, for a number of reasons, inconsequential (for a better analysis of this read my very first blog discussing Obama). I believe that most White Americans are not racists and are genuinely good and decent people that care nothing about a person’s skin color. I have some in my family. Even so, there are still enough White Americans that have racial and racist views that need to be buried with the rest of humanity that lived in the Stone Age. And that’s not only for White Americans, that’s for all Americans and all people of the human race worldwide.
3. America Still Trumps Europe
I know that I get a lot of love from Europe. Yes, a great deal of the readers of this blog are from there. I was actually born there and have visited a few times. But just as I criticize my nation and others, I’ve got to give Europe her due too. Please don’t take it personal. Most of my criticisms on a national level hurled toward governments or portions of society that need a reality check (not necessarily a “Ramon’s Reality”—ok, ok, ok). I mean, when do you think you will see a Black president/prime minister in one of the “progressive” European countries? Pretty much never. They still have a hard time placing Blacks on soccer teams as goal-keepers. Hmmm… Sure you will see a few token members of parliament that are Black. But with all the fuss about how progressive and colorblind Europe is, you would think that that way of thinking would translate into a more diverse group of national leaders. Not so. The Europeans can point the fingers at us as Americans and talk about how racist and backwards we are socially, but their racial hypocrisy far outweighs ours. They helped create the tragic societal and financial messes in Africa through the completely racial and economically motivated colonialism of Africa. They initiated the Atlantic slave trade, the subjugation of the Black natives through direct and indirect rule, the arming of political and ethnic groups for political gain and to help the Black Africans destroy themselves, the inaction or half-hearted action of the U.N. in times of crisis, the enriching and political support of the most merciless and brutal dictators to walk the continent, the intentional underdevelopment of the continent, turned many a blind eye to mass rape, pillaging, kidnapping, and murder of an intra-African nature, offered their banking services for corrupt dictators and other government officials to safely hide their stolen money, and still to this day control huge amounts of financial interests there to include agriculture, mining, tourism industries, etc. Yet, in spite of all of this, America as a country, donates more material, time, human resources, and money to this continent to help combat the problems that Europe and European colonialism (as well as today’s Pseudo-colonialism) has caused and still causes. So, why did I add this little tidbit to the end of my writing—and in the process maybe lost some European followers? It‘s because we all play a part in this silly ancient social cancer of the past—racism. We all (not just the U.S.) have to play our parts to identify and combat this most destructive of social forces. Amen.
Hatin’ On Obama - PART I
- Politics in general
I enjoy politics. I am trying to move away from the word “love” when describing my attachment, enjoyment, or pleasure I get from something. When you think about it, it sounds totally ridiculous to say, “I love politics.” or “I love McDonald’s.” or “I love football.” As Westerners, we really abuse the word love in this way. Before I get off on that tangent, I will continue with my political rant today… As I was saying, I enjoy politics a great deal. I think that in the long run, in our day and age, the politicians are by and large a group of either dishonest men who can pass as crooks in some contexts or they are on their way to being such. However, the fights, contrived fights, struggles, deals, alliances, rivalries, interplay, images, evolutionary change, revolutionary change, personalities, cults, ideas, ideologues, leaders, followers, etc. etc. etc. involved in politics are fascinating. Ironically, I have never voted—well I take that back; I do vote from time to time on the NBA All-Star ballot—ever since you could do it online. But politically, I don’t vote. In terms of the U.S. presidency, I think it’s a waste of time. Really! Every four years the incumbent embellishes all the great things that took place while he was president, while his challenger demands that “change” is what’s needed in order for America to get off the path of destruction. Here in the states, it’s all about the economy. People vote with their wallets. Yes, the bozos talk about crime, education, national security; even age old issues like abortion and gay marriage get tossed around. But, at the end of the day, Americans want to know three things:
1. The unemployment rate
2. The price of gas
3. Can I sell my house and make a profit?
That’s it. And to be honest with you, the president has little to do with that. What happens is that if the economy is good, the president takes the credit. On the other hand, if it is bad, you know who gets the blame. It’s really silly and tells you how uniformed and basically ignorant the American voting populace (as well as pretty much everyone else in the world in this arena) actually is. The fact of the matter is that the market itself is like any other organism; it goes through seasons and cycles of growth, contraction, stagnation, and even death and rebirth. Whatever clown is in the White House has little to do with this. The only thing they can do is put together “bail-out packages” and things of that nature to give the public some kind of reassurance that the government is “on it”—don’t worry—“keep shopping.” Well, pouring money into something that is failing not only does nothing, it can actually exacerbate certain problems. Hasn’t all the billions of dollars in aid to Africa taught us that? Again, I digress…
My point in not voting is that I believe that the powers that control the destiny of a nation—especially ones like the U.S.--lie far outside the walls of the White House. Barack Obama, no matter how you feel about him, campaigned on one word; CHANGE. OK, halfway through his term how is America different? The housing market and the unemployment rate still suck. Therefore, the economy has not changed. There are still young American troops fighting and dying in Iraq and Afghanistan. Therefore, the war has not changed. Statistically, drugs, crime, HIV/AIDS rates, educational performance, etc. has not “changed much” either. So, Mr. Obama sold us a lie or he, like everyone else, is realizing that it’s much easier to talk about than to do about. I firmly believe that most of these areas, save the war, the government has little control over. Most of these issues handle themselves or are issues that are best addressed from the bottom up, the citizenry, not the top down, the government. Besides, in a virtual two-party system like the one in America, how is a narrow choice of two candidates (which are not as politically diametrically opposed as they would have you to believe) a true example of a fair and functioning democracy?
Nonetheless, I do enjoy politics. And for the record, I think Mr. Obama is doing a great job—considering the mess he inherited. Sometimes in the U.S. we focus so much on our problems—on all the imperfections we have in our society, that we forget it is still the number one country that foreigners would move to if they had a choice. It is one of the few countries where you can actually chase a dream and have a good chance of realizing it. It is one of the only places where you can be born into poverty and not have to be locked into it for the rest of your life. America is far from perfect, but it’s still the best deal out there. If you disagree, travel a little bit around the world. Yes, my government has committed heinous crimes not only against its (so called) enemies, but also against its own citizens. But when I juxtapose the U.S.’s record on such things against that of the rest of the world—give me the “stars and stripes” any day. We have a long way to go in America, but I would not rather be anywhere else and try my luck in life. Again, I digress…
It is common to dislike or be against certain people in the political realm that do not support or agree with your particular socio-political ideologies/stances. This is especially true for issues that one feels supremely passionate about (i.e. immigration, abortion, religious liberties, war, etc.). It can downright get nasty and personal. To a degree I understand that. That is part of the nature of politics. I don’t necessarily condone hating someone to the point of wanting to kill them or wanting them to die. But then again our world would have been a lot better if people like Adolph Hitler, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Kim Jong-Il, and Omar al-Bashir would have taken an early “dirt nap.” So, I can’t always agree with killing a leader, but I guess if he/she is the direct cause of mass murder and suffering then their deaths would be well deserved.
With that said, I can understand that there are some people that strongly dislike Barack Obama and what he stands for—no, not to the point of the aforementioned dictators, but there are some who harness a strong dislike for him. If it is in fact rooted in their various political affiliations and beliefs—so be it. America is a country where we can think and express such thoughts openly without fear of harsh reprisal (unlike the country I presently live and work in). But I question the validity of some of this “Anti-Obama-ism” present in America. By default, there will be those in his own political camp who feel that he has not done enough to bring about the promises of “change” that he built his campaign upon—and rightly so. America is pretty much the same. Then there are those who will always be against him because they simply sit on the other side of the political table. OK, I get that. But when one looks at the amount and intensity of this blatant dislike and even hatred towards Barack Obama, I question the legitimacy of its source. Put simply, some of the dislike and, at times, hatred that people feign as just a political/ideological response, I firmly believe is actually rooted in good old American racism. Yep. I said it. Some people do not and therefore will not ever like or appreciate what President Obama is or does—because he is not White. These are the people that find fault with every single thing he says and supports—no matter what. Give me a few minutes and I will explain.
- Dishonest dislike
Ever since the election of Barack Obama, there has been a tendency for a few White people to feel the need to inform Black people that they are not prejudice whenever he comes up in a political/social conversation. Here is what happens. Just about every time you get into a discussion about the current president, if the White person you are speaking with is not a supporter of President Obama, you will hear, “Oh, it’s not that I didn’t vote for Barack Obama because he’s Black—no, no, I just disagree with his policies.” Or you may hear, “No, his color has nothing to do with it. I just don’t like what he stands for.” This is comical. This is like hearing White people tell you how they cannot be prejudice or operate out of bigotry because they have Black friends, they have Black in-laws, or they have at one time or another worked with Black people. As if befriending, working with, or being related to Black people automatically makes it impossible for you to harbor any racial ill will. Such statements are both insulting and absurd to say the least. They are absolutely unnecessary. Not all Black people in America are ready to call you a “racist” simply because you did not vote for or you currently do not agree with or support Barack Obama. For White people to assume that they need to preface each statement about him with such idiocy is quite indicative of their tendency to (still) think for us or evidence a most futile attempt to actually cover their bigotry through denial. When we have a political discussion about Mr. Barack Obama, I am not analyzing his race or ethnicity unless it is relevant to the topic. These attributes of his have nothing to do with his economic, national defense oriented, foreign policy, or domestic issue stances. He is simply the U.S. president with his opinions under examination. He is not the Black president with Black points of view that I will only analyze from a Black perspective. To assume that most if not all Black people in America think this way is highly ignorant--and we all know racism is in part based on ignorance--hmmm…
In reality, I would rather the White people who don’t like the president because of his skin color/ethnicity to just be honest about it. Everyone is entitled to like or dislike who they wish for whatever reason they choose (to include racial bigotry). But I feel it extremely cowardly and deceptive to hate the U.S. president because he is a Black American but hide your disdain behind the veneer of political differences. I can respect a bigot—if he or she is honest about it. At least I know where they are coming from. Sure, if you are a bigot, you are pretty much ignorant, fearful, and filled with hatred. But if you own up to it, I have a much higher opinion of you than the one who shakes my hand, smiles in my face, slaps me on the back, asks how my family is doing, and then refers to me as a “nigger” once behind closed doors. It is my firm belief that more racial bigots are of the latter cowardly sort. At least the skinheads don’t hide behind white sheets when they hold demonstrations.
With that said, the presidency of Barack Obama has caused what I like to term, a “dishonest dislike” to arise in our nation. What I mean by this is that there is a concerted effort to discredit, diminish, and deconstruct everything positive that Mr. Obama does and stands for. It is my belief that this constant barrage of negativity is in part due to racial prejudice. Not all—but a meaningful amount of the “anti-Obama-ism” is rooted not in political differences but in racial differences. How else can you explain some of what is going on? There is an old saying; “Even a broken clock is right twice a day.” But it seems like a broken clock has a better track record than Mr. Obama. Some of these “critics” find fault with every single thing he says, decision he makes, and issue he supports/opposes. I understand that a good portion of it is partisan-ism. But there are others who are just dead set on being against him no matter what. Every opportunity, no matter how trivial, these types of people get, they will try and use to degrade Mr. Obama and his policies. Let’s look at a few
- There are these idiots that are still trying to say that President Obama was not born in the U.S. so therefore, he should be disqualified from running for president. How do you respond to such absurdity? Is responding to it giving it more attention or relevance than it’s worth? I mean, should these imbeciles even be taken seriously? The birth certificate showing that he was in fact born in Hawaii has surfaced. But that has not stopped these buffoons from still claiming that he was born outside of the U.S. Let’s call it what it is—ignorance and racial prejudice. There is an element of White America that cannot come to terms with the fact that a Black man is in the White house with his Black wife and two Black children. They hate to have to concede that from this day forward, at least during one term, the political face of America is symbolized by a Black man—and he doesn’t speak like Bryant Gumble. I have a sound bit of advice for these people; treat this issue as if it were a fence that stood in your way of progress… get over it!
- There is another group of morons who claim that Mr. Obama is secretly a Muslim. And as such, he is not only unfit to be the president (I guess because in a nation where supposedly you can worship or not worship religiously as you please—but seemingly you have to be a White male Christian in order to be president), but he also is a potential turncoat because his allegiances will be to Allah first and country much, much later. Thus, this set of idiots looks at President Obama as some sort of Islamic Manchurian Candidate, that because of his closeted faith, will somehow open the floodgates for America to become the next “Islamo-fascist” (a superbly ridiculous term these boneheads have invented and still abuse) state and open itself up to Islamic Fundamentalist sponsored terrorism. Again, I feel a bit of guilt even devoting time and energy to these fools. For a number of reasons, this whole issue is stupid (sorry, after scouring my severely limited English vocabulary, I am unable to locate a more fitting term). Number one, if we as Americans are proud of, exercise, and to an extent defend the right of all Americans to choose which way they practice or not practice their religious beliefs without fear of discrimination and/or judgment—why should it matter what religion he is? If a president were Catholic, would there be an outcry that he/she would all of a sudden become a politico-religious tool of the Pope and the Vatican? Of course not. Would this be the case if the president was a Mormon? Atheist? No. So it is quite hypocritical to just now, with this particular religious belief in the mix, become so concerned with the president’s religion. There are sane and crazy people who follow all faiths. Just as there are some people who believe that the spreading of their faith should include the acts of forced conversion, slavery, and even murder. But let’s be real. All major faiths of today have had adherents—including so called “Christians”—who have participated in the most inhumane crimes against their fellow citizens. This phenomenon is not limited to Islamic suicide bombers and plane hijacks in the Middle East. Do you know how many pastors and priests have been involved, implicated, and indicted in the Rwandan genocide just a short 17 years ago? Number two, President Obama has on numerous occasions come out and discussed at length his Christian faith. Do you realize that if he were truly a Muslim and did this how offensive this would be to his fellow Muslims and how in some Islamic schools of thought that such an act of Islamic denial/Christian embracing would be considered sacrilegious, abominable and even blasphemous? But apparently, it does not matter how many times President Obama goes on television and openly professes that he is a practicing Christian, there will be those racist idiots that refuse to believe he is not Muslim. Deep down, I think some of them know he is not a Muslim. But their stubborn bigotry will never permit them to release what they feel is another opportunity to discredit him. No matter how unreal and utterly preposterous these Islamic claims are, these racists stop at nothing to make the public believe that because his father was an African Muslim, that the proverbial apple does not fall par from the tree. They will take his Arabic (not Islamic and some ignoramuses state) name, his ethnicity, and his travels and want you to believe that these pieces of “evidence” are enough to scare the American public into thinking that if he is not impeached or stopped, that he will become the “soul brother” version of the Ayatollah Khomeini and replace every church and cross in America with a mosque and crescent moon. I’m sure you can start to see the picture now. Finally, (not because there aren’t more reasons, I am just growing tired of giving this attention) Mr. Obama’s attempts to reach out to the Middle Eastern and Islamic world are seen as examples of his pro-Islamic agenda for America. This is almost laughable. Mr. Obama’s overtures to this area of the world were rooted in motives of peace and stability through partnerships and common goals. They are not the fruit of some Anti-American/pro-Muslim plan to subvert the world and promote global Sharia law. For instance, his famous speech made in Egypt a few years ago was an attempt to build or strengthen the bridge between the Islamic and Middle Eastern community by promoting unity, peace, brotherhood, and development. Some argue, with force and some legitimacy, that this area of the world will never experience that. But whether or not that is an accurate viewpoint, to criticize such an earnest attempt at creating dialogue and identifying common ground with a group of people, that the media and some in the government has taught us to fear, has to be looked at as a step in the right direction. Anyone who uses such an act of positive diplomacy to spin and accuse this man of some Islamic conspiracy is obviously blinded by their own ignorance and prejudice.
- Another comical idea about this president has been expressed by many White people I have come across who say that they don’t support President Obama because he, “Does not represent our forefathers or what this country was built upon.” Oh, wow… with a bit of knowledge about what this country “was built upon” I am not quite sure what they mean—nah, actually I do. But they are ignorant to what they are saying. Let me elaborate. First I will break down what they are saying. These White conservative types (not all White conservatives but the ones that use this lame excuse) are under the impression that all the so-called forefathers of America were a bunch of flag waving Rush Limbaugh types. Not so. Let’s just take the most famous one of all of them and examine him: Thomas Jefferson. This man, a deist, which was a sect of Christianity that summarily denied the existence of miracles and did not adhere to believing in the miracles documented in the Bible. They also believed that God was not too interested in human affairs but sort of stood far away from interaction with humanity. In addition, they looked at the Bible as more of a book of moral principles rather than a book filled with literal truths to be obeyed. This man who would become one of the first U.S. presidents was also involved with a Black mistress whom he even fathered children by. Yeah, that’s what I am talking about; a church going, Bible quoting, fornicator who had no problem with making illegitimate children on the side with his slave, Sally Hemings. She was ironically his slave he inherited from his wife who was also the half-sister of his wife through her father. This made her not only his sister in-law but means that his wife enslaved her own sister. He was also a published racist. Here are some of his quotes:
- Yes, he once wrote concerning the stereotype of Black sexual appetites that, “… love seems with them to be a more eager desire, than a tender delicate mixture of sentiments and sensation…” In other words he contributes to the racist held belief that Black people are more primal in their interpretation and expression of love (being displayed only through sex) than that of the superior minded Whites who appreciate and understand loves emotional and intangible aspects. This is ironic coming from a man who couldn’t contain his animalistic sexual desire and chose a Black woman in a socially submissive position to deal with his passions after the death of his wife.
- Furthermore, in his book entitled Notes on the State of Virginia, he compared Blacks with apes by saying that Blacks preferred the “superior beauty” of White people “as uniformly as is the preference of the Orang-ootan [sic] for the black woman over those of his own species.” So where does that place Mr. Jefferson? If he went past other White women and chose to father children (six in all) by a Black woman, is he not placing himself on the same level as an ape? How could his “superior” White eyes and mind prefer an “inferior” Black woman over the “superior” beauty of a White woman?
- He also wrote that Black people were a “… separated species located beneath humans, but above Orang-ootans [sic].” I wonder how he classified his children by Ms. Hemings; human/monkey hybrids?
- He once wrote that is was “fixed in nature” that Black people were inferior to Whites “in the endowments both of body and mind.” Furthermore, he elaborated that there was an “inane inferiority of Black compared to Whites.”
- He was a staunch supporter of slavery and segregation. He once wrote that, “Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free. [But] the two races… cannot live in the same government.” No wonder this man was found to have well over 100 slaves at his death.
In addition, Thomas Jefferson is credited with authoring most of the Declaration of Independence. Therefore, he is credited with coming up with the famous phrase, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” I am sure you can plainly see the hypocrisy therein. Also, take note of this; what does it say about the character of a man, who took advantage of a woman who by the very nature of her social status as a slave (his slave), had to submit to him in every way? This woman, who bore him six children, remained his slave and so did their progeny. Yes, his own children were also his slaves. According to his beliefs, racially, she and thus their children were subhuman. Nonetheless, she was human enough for him to take advantage of his superior social position and have sex with, but she was not human enough for him to marry, free, or free their children who were closer to humanity (according to his racist theories) than she. Let that sink in.
Also, in regards to America’s so called “forefathers,” the very Constitution itself is evident of their elitist and racist attitudes. If this were not the case, why would it have to be changed numerous times in many years later to allow Black and then women the right to vote? Yes, the framers of this nation want you to believe that they viewed “all men” as “equal” yet, there was no provision made for women and non-Whites to be involved in the political process through exercising the right to vote. America: for White men and by White men—unless labor is needed to be done. Not only that, within the Constitution is a statement that tells states that when conducting a census to get an idea of how each state should be represented numerically in terms of taxing and revenue distribution, Blacks were to be counted as 3/5 or 60% of a person. So, not only were these “citizens” used for free labor and thus served as the backbone of the economic wealth and growth of America, but they were not even considered people by definition of the Constitution. This unsurprisingly falls right in line with the mindset of its framers such as Thomas Jefferson who of course considered such people subhuman. But at the end of the day, I guess a being that is 60% human is good enough to sire children by but not quite human enough to count as a real person.
So, when people say that Barack Obama does not represent what “our forefathers” stood for—well, I could not agree more and I am glad he does not. To me, if he stood for those things—an America controlled and directed by rich, White males politically, socially, and economically—he would never have been given a chance to be president. But then again who’s to say America is not that in spite of his position. I’ll let you decide.
The Gross Inhumanity of Race Based Slavery
OK, let me preface this post by saying that this is actually a response I recently sent to a friend of mine studying in the U.S. I did not spend that much time on it, so, it is basically “off the cuff.” One of my specialties is the subject of History so even though I did feel comfortable giving her this answer, it is not my most academic submission to say the least. Also, I am in no way disrespecting, degrading, or diminishing any ethnic group, nationality, religion, etc. or their contributions to society. I am just restating factual information that has been supported and documented by countless scholars for many years. Slavery, as we all know, is an ugly blemish upon the history of mankind as a whole, and we as humanity will not be fully free until this most awful of all social institutions is completely obliterated. Please enjoy…
You wanted me to elaborate a bit about slavery, namely some of the fundamental differences between racial slavery and slavery taking place within a society where racial differences were not necessarily the determining factor per se. Well, I do not claim to be an expert in this field but I have read quite a bit about it. I will limit my discussion to what took place here in Africa. You already have a basic knowledge of the African/Atlantic slave trade. You fully understand that that sort of slavery was based purely on race. It found its origin in the Caribbean when natives began to die off massively (through genocidal acts and their inability to naturally fight off diseases brought from Europe) and the colonial powers that be needed to replace the dying labor force with one that could deal with the elements. At the suggestion of a high ranking Catholic official (eventually a Bishop) in the area, Bartolomé de las Casas, the colonists starting importing massive amounts of West Africans. This was already being done elsewhere but his suggestion gave the colonial powers even more reason to delve deeper into this practice. Many historians blame him for the Atlantic slave trade's eventual growth and domination in terms of large scale its use for cheap labor. This trend eventually spread to North, Central, and South America with the majority being imported into Brazil. Over time, the tension between enslaving humans and the moral and religious arguments opposing such behavior presented the individuals involved with an issue to be addressed. The religionists used the Bible through the twisting of scripture and other contextual tricks and decpetive means to justify the subjugation of Black Africans in this manner. In their view, the Africans were both cursed and destined by the Almighty to live lives as slaves, while White people were destined to rule. Their argument was that this was simply the natural order of things. The other part of this religious viewpoint was that these Black Africans were ignorant heathens and were in need of being exposed to Christianity. This is ironic in that Christianity reached Africa well before it reached Europe (read in the book of Acts 8:27-39 about the Ethiopian eunuch). Also, quite a number of the stolen and enslaved Africans came from lands where Islam was widely practiced. Since Islam is the third and final major world religion finding its origins in the Middle East, it is safe to say that some of the same lands where Islam was practiced could have also been exposed to Christianity and Judaism. Plus, there are elements of the aforementioned faiths within Islam. So, the White mans' belief that the Black African was devoid of any contact with monotheistic religion, literacy, or civilization is rather erroneous to say the least. The other argument that White people used to justify the subjugation and enslavement of Black Africans found its root in what was looked as at "race science" in those times. White "scientists" and other "social scholars" believed that Blacks were in essence a subhuman species (a belief even held by such statesmen as Thomas Jefferson) that by the mere order in the world of nature, naturally placed them in a socially subservient position to Whites. They were looked at as beings that needed to be controlled and trained in order to bring them into some type of civilized social order. They were seen as lazier, less intelligent, more given to sexual urges, more emotional, less rational, and physically tougher and athletic than Whites. Thus, this combination of little intellectual capacity, physical prowess, and impulsive behavior justified treating them as animals in the sense of treating them as livestock to control, buy and sell, and use for labor purposes. It is interesting to note that this view of Black Africans and their descendants prevented them from lawfully becoming citizens, exercising certain rights extended to non-Blacks, lawfully learning how to read or assemble, having their families and marriages respected to prevent the selling off and breaking up of families, owning fire-arms, or travelling freely. Yet, these same White men that did all they could to keep these Blacks in a social state that was equivalent to that of livestock had no problem raping them or using them for other forms of sexual pleasure and even proudly siring offspring from them. Of course the children of such efforts were still considered socially and biologically inferior and were also kept as slaves for the most part. This is the essence of slave trade in the Western Hemisphere. It was purely racial. Yes, it was instituted and kept alive for so long because of its economic impact. But the nature of it was born and bred out of a doctrine of extreme racism. It differed from other forms of slavery found in various parts of the world in that these slaves were birthed into a social condition that they would die in. There were no avenues to get freedom other than their masters freeing them. But even if they were to gain freedom, their Black skin guaranteed that they would never gain full citizenship in a White controlled society. This was even the case for those who were of mixed race. They were slaves because they were Black--period. In other societies, slavery was sometimes temporal. This type of slavery was called "indentured servitude." It was slavery with an option for the slave to buy their own freedom. The only slaves in this category in the Western hemisphere were White ones who paid for their passage to the "New World" by becoming one. Also, in other places, slaves could eventually become citizens and/or marry freemen. Interracial marriage was pretty much prohibited in most parts of America. Consequently, non-British colonies such as those in Central and South America did practice more intermixing and intermarriage. It seems that of all European racists, the British were the most intolerant and hateful. As stated earlier, other forms of systematic slavery afforded the slaves options for citizenship such as purchasing it or fighting in the military. Once citizens, these former slaves enjoyed the same rights and privileges as other citizens. Nonetheless, even if Black slaves were freed, they would never have been allowed to enjoy the fruits of citizenship. In other societies there was not such a sharp contrast of skin color to identify one as a member of the lower social class. And even in situations where this was the case, the presence of Blacks in other societies was not always the result of slavery, therefore Blacks could intermingle with the rest of the citizens without this cultural stigma being attached to them. Therefore, slavery in the Americas was the most brutal and inhumane type of slavery. When humans are captured, bred, bought and sold, killed, fed, and disciplined no better than animals would be and at the same time raped, humiliated, dismembered for attempts at escape, branded and otherwise mutilated, and even suffering the division of their families, one cannot really put this type of slavery on the same level as slavery practiced elsewhere. In other societies, there were plenty of instances where even slaves were allowed to operate with a limited number of rights. The only rights that Black slaves had in the Western hemisphere was to obey or suffer the consequences. The racialist component of slavery in the Western hemisphere was so entrenched in society, that even many years after the so called freeing of the slaves took place, Black people have suffered enormous amounts prejudice, discrimination, injustice, disenfranchisement, violence, and political, cultural, and social exclusion. The same can't be said for other societies that practiced a form of slavery that did not have this element within its fabric.
Nonetheless, on the other side of Africa, a form of brutal slavery was also practiced. This institution of slavery was established long before the Atlantic slave trade even began and small trickles of it still operate clandestinely today. In fact, there are records still in existence of Black Africans being sold in the port of Djibouti with French and Arab involvement as late as the mid-1950's. The Arab-Islamic slave trade took place on the East Coast and Northern, Central, and Southern interior of Africa. Again, this was based on race. These Muslim Arabs felt that they were racially and at times religiously superior to the Black Africans. When the said Africans were not Muslims, their enslavement was justified on religious grounds. Slavery has been and is still permitted in the religion of Islam. Its founder, Muhammed as well as his initial followers had slaves. Even today in countries like Mauritania and Sudan, religious and racial slavery is openly practiced. Anyway, when these Arab Muslims could not rely on the religious crutch to support their practice, they took the slaves on account of them being Black. Thus they operated within this inhumane practice out of a sense of racial/cultural superiority. Ironically, the Black Americans who are part of the politico-religious group The Nation of Islam, are quite incorrect when they claim that Islam is the Black man's true religion and that Christianity was a tool used to enslave Blacks. In the hands of corrupt and evil men, religion (of all types) has always been used to subjugate and control the masses. For centuries before the Europeans colonizers set foot in Africa with the intention of enslaving them, Arab Muslims were traversing places such as Tanzania (Zanzibar), Kenya, and Somalia for purposes of trade to include that of humans. This is one of the reasons why the African languages of Swahili, Somali, and even the main language of Ethiopia, Amharic, all have a significant amount of Arabic words/phrases in them. Black slaves were taken from a number of nations from Northern to Southern Africa on the Eastern side. The main reason for this particular slave trade was not the same as the one taking place on the West coast. These slaves were not taken primarily for large scale labor projects on plantations. The men were taken and emasculated to be used as administrators and soldiers. The women were taken primarily for domestic purposes--sex slaves. Since these Arab men did not want anyone to be able to spoil their sexy, Black objects of pleasure, they systematically had most if not all the male captives castrated. Some were actually left untouched to also be used for sexual purposes by some of these slave owners. Like the Black Africans enslaved in the Western Hemisphere, these slaves were often stripped naked and mercilessly examined by interested buyers and selling owners. This, like the aforementioned slavery system was based on race. However, the slavery practiced in this era and part of the world did allow the masters to marry their female sex slaves (albeit within a polygamous household) and some of the men did actually gain citizenship and even at times achieved great social status. All of this information and more can be found in a book entitled, Islam's Black Slaves: The Other Black Diaspora by Ronald Segal.
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
A Special Thanks
I have been doing this BLOG thing for almost two months now and it has been a wonderful and even theraputic experience for me. I put down writing years ago and posting this BLOG has caused me to resurrect this love of mine. I just want to say that the love and support I have been shown from the the readers has been overwhelming. I look at the stats almost on a daily basis and I see that people read the stuff I put out from places literally the world over. From the bottom of my heart I just want to say "thank you." It means so much to me to see folks reading the BLOG from India, Malaysia, Singapore, Denmark, Germany, the UK, UAE, the US, Canada, Ukraine, Zambia, South Africa, Rwanda, Sudan, Djibouti, and Kuwait. I hope that the love and interest spreads even more. I apologize for not being able to get you all fresh stuff everyday. But I am really limited to creating the pieces I post during the little free time that I have. I also try to devote a good amount of time to quality research so that I don't submit garbage. Finally, my BLOG is my reality. As such, I understand that my views and opinions are not necessarily universal. I don't want them to be. I just aim to provoke two things: thought and discussion. Please, my worldwide familiy, submit your thoughts, questions, comments, and crtiticisms to me either on the post itself or on the email address listed on my profile. You all have a great day and keep up the support.
R
R
Saturday, February 12, 2011
what to do when a major part of soul music has lost its soul
Public Enemy, one of the greatest and most influential rap groups of all time released an album back in 2007 entitled, How Do You Sell Soul to a Soulless People Who Sold Their Soul? A year before this, Nas, a rapper of significant influence himself, released an album entitled, Hip-Hop Is Dead. What were these respected and established artists telling us? Were they just bitter musical veterans waving their proverbial middle fingers to the new generation and thus new tastes of rap music? Were they just artists who realized that they were on the downslide of their careers who were ranting from a sense of resentment? I don’t think so. I really believe they were telling us something. They were speaking as street prognosticators—urban poets if you will--who could put their collective ears to the ground and hear the arrival of something ominous just over the horizon. They could look into that same horizon and see the bleak future of a music that was once raw, real, and relevant being slowly changed into something simplistic, superficial, and sadly--soulless.
As mentioned in my earlier piece concerning the death of Tupac, it seems that most of today’s rappers literally took the Notorious B.I.G.’s line, “Money, hoes, and clothes—all a nigga knows” to heart when establishing the parameters of their lyrical content. For example, a very popular song entitled, “Successful” released back in 2009 by one of hottest artists of recent times has a hook that goes like this, “I want the money—money and the cars--cars and the clothes… the hoes… I suppose…” I guess originality is no longer the valuable attribute in music that it used to be—well at least he added the word “cars” to the line. But seriously, the narrowness of the topics rapped about in today’s rap music along with its continual dilution as a separate musical genre through never-ending “collaborations” with other musical forms and finally, its oversaturation of artists have served to prescribe the death sentence for this musical art form. People today in regards to entertainment, especially at the consumer level, love to adopt overused clichés. One of these irritating terms we hear is; “the game has changed.” Well, like everything in life, change is inescapable. But in terms of pure rap music, this change has not been a progressive one. Not all change is revolutionary—or even evolutionary. By that, I mean that this music has not changed for the better. The very essence of what made rap music special is steadily being replaced by what it once stood against—total selling out, mass commercialization, the intended avoidance of discussing relevant issues (especially those affecting minorities, urbanites, and the other poor and disenfranchised), and the growing trend to make rap music into the next form of “Top 40 Pop Music Type” of entertainment (i.e. “crossing over”). To some who read this, I might sound like some bitter and old “rap purist” who refuses to change with the times. But to others out there who grew up listening to rap music, what we are going through is the equivalent of replacing good home cooked meals with prepackaged ready-to-serve microwave TV Dinners.
Of all the timeless and priceless sayings of Jesus, one comes to mind as I start my criticism of this particular portion of rap music’s sickness; “For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?” (Mark 8:36 & 37). Here, the Master Teacher was challenging His listeners with a couple questions of significant depth; in the end, if you were able to amass every possession in the world even to the point of attaining the whole world itself, what would be your profit or gain once you die? On top of that, if you were able to hold these possessions, can you trade them for your soul? We all know the answer. It is such a heavy statement. One aspect of looking at this is that if you spend your life chasing money, wealth, fame, etc. (i.e. “the world”) then you, by default, would have relinquished your soul in the process. Now, I am not examining these verses in regards to talking about eternal life per se or any type of dogmatic doctrinal teaching of that nature--no. The concept of “soul” has a few different meanings and applications. Here, I believe Jesus is talking about a person’s soul in the context of eternal life. However, this can also be applied to the term of “selling one’s soul.” The soul is considered a word/term describing that intangible part of us that gives us life and self-awareness—sort of like a person’s immaterial essence or spirit. If one has been said to sell their soul, it means that they have exchanged their individuality (or free expression thereof) or spirituality for something material and/or temporal like riches or fame. In the world of artistry—better yet music making, a person who has sold their soul has ceased to value and cultivate their respective uniqueness in the way(s) they express their musical talent/gifts in order to get money and fame through making music that will please the most people or create the most profit. In the pursuit of this, an artist switches from being inspired by certain aspects of life like love, pain, happiness, tragedy, spirituality, joy, birth, death, history, politics, social issues, etc. to being solely focused on material gain. This can force an artist to create music that emphasizes things that he/she does not necessarily believe in or care much about. But since money is the master in their world, the quality and legitimacy of their musical expression means much less than it should or did initially. What matters most are record sales, publicity, endorsements, concert tours, exposure to the highest number of demographic categories, corporate marketability, and things of that nature. Therefore, when they want to create art, the sense of originality, creativity, and faithfulness to their set of values becomes non-existent. The material they use to make music consists of trends, polls, market samples, customer surveys, focus groups, whatever the next hot artist is doing (e.g. audio-tune) etc. So, in the end, the music and the artist have become robots—soulless creators creating soulless creations filled with soulless messages to be consumed by soulless people. In time, since the music is mimicked, mass marketed, and mired in mediocrity—it is prostituted until the very last drop of life (soul) falls from it and eventually dies. Remember Rock and Roll?
Put another way, if Bob Marley sold his soul, instead of singing about the necessity of universal human rights in the song “Get Up Stand Up!” he would be concerned with making some reggae tune about smoking a spliff in the back his new Rolls Royce while cruising down the mean streets of Kingston, Jamaica with two fine island honeys in the back seat with him. Instead of him giving us classics like “Buffalo Soldier,” he would have some song entitled “Street Soldier” where he discusses the usual night of dropping a few thousand dollars in a strip club tipping the bubble butted dancers, buying ridiculously priced liquor, while dressed in designer rags—oh yeah, you gotta remember to add a line about how everyone is armed and ready to commit fratricide and how the rims on his car are larger and outshine even the gaudy mouth jewelry of his rival Rastas. You see where I am going? Sound familiar?
Materialism, to a certain extent, has always been around in rap music. From LL Cool J and Erik B. and Rakim’s humongous gold ropes to Ice Cube’s 1964 Impala Low-rider, rappers have always had something to say about making money and looking good. This strong need to look the best and outshine everyone else when it comes to fashion and vehicle choice is actually rooted in the Black Americans’ need to assert themselves in a society that still looks down upon them. Being “hood rich” or “ghetto fabulous,” staying “sharp” all the time in the most expensive designer fashions, being draped in the gaudiest of jewelry, and “ridin’” around is the highest priced luxury/sports cars are all manifestations of a people who daily struggle to let the world know they are just as important, if not more, than anyone else. These serve as not only status but social and self-image symbols in a world that labels the men as lazy, stupid, and apt to commit crime while the women are looked at as loud, ignorant, morally loose, and non-contributors to society. In this mode of thinking, money is looked at as a means to buy things to convince everyone that you’ve “made it” rather than a tool to invest, build, and ensure that your posterity can stand on your shoulders both economically and socially. Therefore, rappers and their lyrics become extensions of Black Americans’ fantasies of “making it big” and showing it to the whole world; “Look, I matter too. I have $10,000 worth of gold around my neck, I am wearing $1,200 shoes, and one of my cars costs more than your house. Envy me.” The need to be envied is rooted in a serious lack of self-worth and confidence. People who need to cover themselves with items of value to feel like they matter don’t need more money—they need therapy. This is also an outgrowth of a people that have struggled with the effects and the stigmatization of being stuck in poverty. Thus, for some Blacks, expensive items are emblems that are utilized to sever that connection between being Black and poor. For example, some would go as far as wearing gold emblems of companies such as Cadillac and Mercedes Benz around their necks. Also notice that the clothes they don usually are littered with the official logos of such brands as Gucci, Chanel, and Ralph Lauren.
In a musical genre that finds it’s heartbeat in the urban American streets with testosterone fueled bravado being pumped through its veins, the concept of becoming bigger and better both fame and financial wise is just part of the landscape. Rappers always have and always will boast about how much money, jewelry, women, cars, and other items--that go along with wealth--they have. Rap music, in large part, is about competition. Freestylers battle rap, rival rappers drop “dis tracks” to outdo one another, and just recently we witnessed Kanye West and 50 Cent try to outsell one another in the first week of their respective releases. Nothing in America and for that matter today’s world allows one to be greater in stature than how much money they possess. This feature, rappers bragging about having or affording this and that, will always be a staple in this type of music. However, at no time in its history was the pursuit and worship of cash emphasized so much lyrically as it is today. In just about every song, rappers must mention how much money they have access to and how they find different ways to waste it—not invest it. From pouring overpriced bottles of alcohol out at clubs and throwing cash in the air to “make it rain” upon naked women at striptease establishments to purchasing six-figure vehicles and palatial homes, today’s rappers stop at nothing to try and convince us that they are just a few dollars behind Bill Gates. The music videos are even worse. It seems that the only ingredients one needs to make a rap video are a group if bikini clad women, a couple bottles of alcohol, a few luxury/sports cars, a pool and/or Jacuzzi, and some ignorant homeboy with one hand on his crotch and the other holding a fist full of C-Notes. You throw in a couple slow motion shots of him walking through a crowded night club and viola; you have a successfully created rap video. Like the subject matter of the music—it too is carbon copied and sold as something “new” and “fresh.”
In other words, rappers seem to be stuck in a mode where they can’t seem to imagine rapping about anything but their wallet, wardrobe, and women. Sure, money, nice clothes, expensive cars, and chics (or as Biggie and Drake say, “hoes”) are cool. But I am compelled to lose respect for an MC who can’t seem to rap about anything else. Does not this get old? There are plenty of other things—more important things to make songs about. How many “rags to riches” and “hoes and bitches” songs can we take anymore? The gross pursuit of material gain—at all costs—is disgusting. It has come to the point where we have thrown off all forms of social and moral standards when we assess the characters of these artists. They openly rap about how they sold drugs, pimped, robbed, assaulted, and even killed fellow Black Americans in order to “get paid.” Really? These guys speak and write books and people support them. People excuse and justify their past. They are never called upon to answer for these crimes they committed in the “paper chase.” Nonetheless, if they are made to explain such heinous behavior, they can conveniently blame the system, poverty, racism, or having no father around to explain why they acted in such a manner against their own Black brothers and sisters for money. We never hold them or their lyrics accountable. So, in the end, when you spend your life and sell your soul in order to “Get Rich or Die Tryin,” if you had to poison a number of people with drugs, put a few bullets in people, steal from a couple individuals, or intimidate and coerce young women into prostitution, as long as you got paid and eventually made millions of dollars rapping about it—it’s all good. Because hey, “It’s all About the Benjamin’s”—right? Yeah, but what sobers me up is that this same way of thinking is what justified White men to kill Native Americans and steal Blacks from Africa to put them into slavery. Who cares how you get paid--as long as you get paid? This message is the danger of the commercialization and soullessness of today’s rap music. I can understand some of rap music’s lyricists rapping about what happens in the dark streets across America—drug use, crime, parental neglect, police brutality, systematic oppression of the poor and minorities, etc. But there is an acute difference between rapping about it to draw attention to it or even taking on the persona of that character to give him/her a voice and rapping about it in a braggadocios manner to the point of glorifying such aspects of society or even exaggerating and outright lying about one’s involvement in order to create shock value to sell records. Talking about the atrocities and tragedies that take place in society and condoning them are two different things. Music helps shape the minds of the listeners—it is not just a reflection of reality—it influences it. With that said, rappers should learn the value of their words and see that the saturation of lyrics that do nothing but promote the idea that getting money “at all cost” is actually costing the music, themselves, and the subculture that supports them their collective souls.
Where are the classic rappers? Where are the rappers with longevity? Where are the classic songs for that matter? You know, something classic is something timeless. You won’t play a classic song and people will complain by saying, “Man turn that off. That song is old.” The reason these questions are relevant is because today there is such a large amount of rappers that have created a tidal wave of artists and music to choose from. On top of that, artists are becoming old, in terms of their popularity, and being replaced by new ones at a rapid pace. This oversaturation of the market with rap artists is making the music into one that is mass produced in a “cookie-cutter” sort of fashion. In other words, there really is nothing new, fresh, or original out there. Artists really have no opportunities to establish themselves and create a body of work of any meaning because they have to constantly look over their shoulders to see who’s gunning for their spot. This forces them to abandon being true to their individual artistic expression and follow the very temporal musical trends of the day. Pretty soon, everyone is sounding like everyone else. Sadly, it is not a case of beat or voice sampling anymore—we now have such an overabundance of songs that are nothing but the result of beat high-jacking or song remaking. Anytime you flood the market with a huge amount of the same product, its demand, value, and general quality all diminish. Rap music is no different. How many rappers do we have named “Lil’ this” or “Lil’ that”? How many rappers do we have that talk about nothing more than “pimpin’ hoes,” “drug deals,” or “club hoppin’?” How many rappers do we have that just put on shades, a pair of jeans, grab their crotches, and lean against a Bentley while rapping about themselves do we have? How many songs are we going or hear about mouth jewelry, the “ice on my wrist,” the wonders of smoking marijuana, the size of “my rims,” or how much you want to be like them but you never will be, will we have to continue to endure? Do you get what I am saying? It’s almost like rap music will be the next thing to be shipped off and made in a factory in China. Soon we will have bootleg Jay Zs and Snoop Doggs—come to think of it, we already do. Look, do this for me. Look at a rap video and look and listen to the particular rapper showcased. Listen to the subject matter of the lyrics, the tempo and type of the flow, and the whole style of the rapper in general. I bet you can name at least three or four rappers that can be put in the same place and do the exact same thing. Just throw on a pair of jeans, some Nikes, an oversized ball cap sitting sideways on his head, and don’t forget the “Jesus piece” and you got it. These guys have become the equivalent of a plastic G.I. Joe Action figure found in any toy store. When this music went from expressing reality to being a mass marketed image, it lost is soul.
Finally, the fusion of rap with other musical forms will also be considered one of the nails that are being hammered into its coffin. There has always been a loose relationship between rap and other musical forms—particularly R&B. Nonetheless, rap has always kept its distinctiveness. On the other hand a noteworthy amount of the rap put out today plays the background role to Rock, Pop, and R&B songs. This is diluting the genre. It used to be the other way around—R. Kelly sang the hook to “I’m F****** You Tonight,” as did K.C. and Joe Joe on Tupac’s “How Do You Want It?” Not to mention Nate Dog made a career out of singing hooks and background vocals on rap songs. Yet, these artists just complemented the songs they were involved in. Again the reason for this is money. The people pushing these so called “collaborations” care nothing for the authenticity of the music. They just want to market music to as many demographic groups as possible. How else do you explain ridiculous releases by team-ups like Ludacris and Justin Beiber, Tim McGraw and Nelly, Kanye West and Estelle, and Snoop Dogg and Katy Perry? Some may think such “collaborations” are fun and harmless. But such creations were unthinkable years ago. To team in such a way with these types of artists was considered “selling out.” But I guess what was selling out yesterday is business as usual today. The market has no soul. There has even been a new category for this type of music added to the list of Grammy Awards since 2002 (entitled “Best Rap/Sung Collaboration”). What does that say? It says that this type of music will continue to grow. Well, what happens when the amount of rap in songs decreases? It loses its significance. Eventually rap will be diluted to the point where if an artist wants to get into “the game” he/she must be put on some Pop/R&B artists music first (haven’t we already seen that happen?). On top of that, trying to break into the business by doing such things severely limits what a rapper can and cannot rap about—further dilution. Things don’t stay where they are. Everything changes—good, bad, better, worse, bigger, smaller, smarter, dumber, etc. Can’t you see what is happening to rap? The quest for finding ways to insert it into different markets is causing it to be reshaped and toned down to feed to the masses. Pretty soon you have the equivalent of sugar free or diet rap. It may sound (taste) similar but the contents are very different.
In the end, maybe I am just a guy in his mid-thirties who cannot get with the times. Everything in this world has a beginning, middle, and end. Maybe it is time for rap music as I knew it and know to just die. Disco died. House music morphed into techno. And Rock and Roll became Hard Rock, Heavy Metal, Grunge, and even seeped its way into country music and a few futile attempts at a fusion with rap. To some, especially in the generations that came after mine, this is just the way things go. But in my opinion, the changes that took and are taking place in rap have little to do with it going through natural changes and development. I see it as having been a victim of corporate hijacking and falling into the hands of a generation who have little knowledge and understanding of its history and significance in the fabric of not only American culture, but culture worldwide. Rap music defined, shaped, and gave a voice to a people who were routinely ignored. It edged its way onto the stage of mainstream music and took over eventually. It became the musical medium of choice for people worldwide regardless of nationality, race, economic status, religion, etc. I can go anywhere in the world and talk about Tupac, N.W.A., Jay Z, Eminem, and Lil’ Wayne. But just as rap music is fading into pop music and having its identity diluted, its life is fading away waiting to be replaced by another musical art form. Thus rap music, as I knew it—as I know it--is soon dead.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)



